| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Artic Routes | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Oct 13 2009, 08:07 PM (988 Views) | |
| Rt 75 All Day | Oct 13 2009, 08:07 PM Post #1 |
|
Occasional Rider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I Been Seeing Some SEPTA Rts That Need To Become Artics Because Overcrowdness There Are Rts That Are Artics And There are Rts That Aren't I Think That Rts That Should Be Artics Are:1,6,8,9,14,18,20,22,26,27,33,48,50,54,55,60,65,80,C,R Do You Thinks Some of These Rts Should Be or Shouldn't be. |
![]() |
|
| SouthernSeptaRida215 | Oct 13 2009, 08:24 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Southern Depot PTV Co-Leader & Correspondent.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think the Rt. 77, 35, 310, 402 and the 316 A.K.A L.U.C.Y, also the Rt. 91 these routes are heavy hitters that I think these Routes will need 45 second headways during Rush Hour where should be ran with Neoplan Articulated. |
![]() |
|
| Rt 75 All Day | Oct 13 2009, 08:26 PM Post #3 |
|
Occasional Rider
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Are You Sure Cuz These Routes are Usually Eldarados |
![]() |
|
| Jayayess1190 | Oct 13 2009, 08:55 PM Post #4 |
|
Foamer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
:blink: 6, 9, 14, 18, 22, 26, 48, 55, 60 65, 80, C already use artics, where have you been? They can't be 100% artic due to there not enough Neo's to go around, and they don't always need one 100% of the time.
Edited by Jayayess1190, Oct 13 2009, 08:59 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| TRANSIT_FREAK | Oct 13 2009, 09:07 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Simpsonized!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think your way over your head. ^o) |
![]() |
|
| CACrafter88bk2504 | Oct 14 2009, 07:54 AM Post #6 |
|
Transit Historian
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Let's be realistic. There are times along routes 35 where ridership patterns are so small that all you would need is a pick up truck to pick up the few riders that are out there on the corners. The 310: Let the 310 become incorporated into the 55 and that will solve this issue. No more 310. Trips would be designated as 55:HORSHAM via WILLOW GROVE. |
![]() |
|
| CACrafter88bk2504 | Oct 14 2009, 07:57 AM Post #7 |
|
Transit Historian
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The 91? Simply make it on an hourly headway on Saturdays. Interestingly, I think that Frontier actually has the space to house at least 10 units. |
![]() |
|
| buswizard | Oct 14 2009, 08:36 AM Post #8 |
|
^^^ My sister needs a copy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nobody said the 17. that is a worthy artic candidate. So is the 109. |
![]() |
|
| Tritransit Area | Oct 14 2009, 08:44 AM Post #9 |
![]()
Transit Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No, for these reasons: 1) Not everyone takes the 55. There are people that come off the 22, the R2, and even the 98 to transfer to the 310. 2) The 55 is unreliable. The bus is consistently late! 3) Higher operating costs? The ridership during the midday and Saturday is fairly low. What would be the point of running big route 55 buses at this time? In regards to the 310, why did I see Champion Defenders running on the line? The route is OVERCROWDED! I hope they aren't putting it on the 8:27 departure from the mall....that needs at least a 40 footer! |
![]() |
|
| Septa_kid | Oct 14 2009, 11:13 AM Post #10 |
|
flxie!!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ROUTES 56, and 70 NEED ARTICS DURRING RUSH HOUR!!! THEY'RE TOO CROWDED! |
![]() |
|
| buswizard | Oct 14 2009, 11:14 AM Post #11 |
|
^^^ My sister needs a copy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
4) ...Route 80!!!!!!!!!! |
![]() |
|
| frankl3217 | Oct 14 2009, 11:38 AM Post #12 |
|
Advanced Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
in my opinion, routes 7, 47, 23, 17, 52 ,G can use artics |
![]() |
|
| ctrabs74 | Oct 14 2009, 12:14 PM Post #13 |
|
Advanced Transit Fan
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I could see artics - if not full-time, but at least on a majority of trips - on the 17, 52, 70, and the R. One route that didn't get mentioned is the 40. Sometimes, that can get a little crowded, at least between Conshohocken/Ford and 40 St El Station. Do you really want to try putting an artic on the 23? Those snakes would have a hell of a time getting up the hill. |
![]() |
|
| Tritransit Area | Oct 14 2009, 02:35 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Transit Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
True, but they ran for 10 years on the 9, 27, and 65 without severe problems for the most part. They'd be rather slow in general on the 23, though. |
![]() |
|
| Tritransit Area | Oct 14 2009, 02:37 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Transit Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thank you - that's the most important reason! By the way, they should really look into adjusting the times for the 80, adding another AM and PM trip after the current end of service. Those El Dorados get PACKED on specific trips (I can easily point them out) and an extra 80 bus would solve the problem. I cringe as I imagine that some of the Champions might be carrying those huge passenger loads right now. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Bus and Trackless Trolley · Next Topic » |




![]](http://209.85.48.18/static/1/pip_r.png)






3:37 PM Nov 23